A composite variable had been produced from three solitary things that had been standardised and then averaged.
Greater ratings suggest greater understanding of the sexual partner at enough time the intimate contact occurred (? =. 78). Particularly, individuals had been expected: (a) ‘How long had you understood this girl during the time you first had sex? (in months)’ (open-ended; M = 23.60, SD = 28.41) (b) ‘How can you explain this woman to your relationship at that time? ’ (1=someone you merely came across to 5=spouse/long-term partner; M = 3.46, SD = 1.10) and (c) ‘At enough time you first had sexual experience of this girl, just how well could you state you knew her? ’ (1 = generally not very to 5 = very well; M = 3.96, SD = 1.05).
How many intimate habits that individuals involved with throughout that very very first intimate encounter had been ascertained by asking individuals: ‘Did you and your spouse do any one of the next at this juncture (check always all that apply)’. Intimate habits included: sexual kissing/making out, fondling your breasts, fondling your spouse’s breasts, fondling your genitals, fondling your lover’s genitals, getting dental intercourse, offering dental intercourse, genital penetration, and penetration that is anal. A count regarding the true wide range of intimate habits participants endorsed was made (M = 3.81, SD = 2.29).
A single-item had been utilized to ascertain whom initiated the initial intimate encounter with a lady partner, ‘Whose idea ended up being it to own intercourse on that very very very first occasion? ’ (1=completely your idea to 7=completely your lover’s concept; M = 4.32, SD = 1.06). Chronilogical age of very very first consensual intimate encounter with a feminine partner had been determined with an individual open-ended product, ‘Approximately exactly just what age had been you the very first time you ever endured any consensual (both events consented) sexual intercourse/contact with a female? ’ (M = 16.32, SD = 4.08, n = 114).
Two-items were utilized to ascertain whether or not the participant had utilized medications or liquor ahead of her very very first intimate encounter with a lady: ‘Did you personally take in any liquor about this sexual event? ’ and ‘Did you smoke cigarettes cannabis or make use of any kind of medications about this intimate event? ’ (Yes/No). A variable that is dichotomous designed to suggest whether or not the participant had utilized alcohol or any other medications ahead of their very very first same-sex intimate encounter (56% suggested yes, n = 69).
Finally, participants had been expected the regularity with that they had involved in an amount of intimate tasks, since becoming intimately active, that the CDC (1991) considers ‘high risk’ for enhancing the likelihood of contact with sexually transmitted infections, regardless of the usage condoms. These possibly dangerous intimate actions are examined in past studies ( ag e.g., Cooper et al., 1998; Patrick et al., 2011) trying to examine basic associations between motivations for intercourse and lifetime intimate results, such as the initial validation research for the Sex Motives Scale (Cooper et al., 1998). A count variable was made to denote the sheer number of seven possibly dangerous intimate tasks (M = 1.87, SD = 1.64) endorsed by individuals. Products specifically described: rectal intercourse; one-night stands; sex with a complete complete complete stranger or prostitute; sex in exchange for medications or cash; intercourse having a homosexual or bisexual guy; sexual intercourse with someone who has utilized intravenous medications; or sexual intercourse with an individual who is contaminated with HIV.
We included covariates we expected might influence reported motivations for and subjective experiences associated with ladies’ very first same-sex encounter that is sexual. All model quotes adjust for participant cultural minority status (0 = White, 1 = non-White; 84% n = 103 defined as White/Caucasian), how good the participant remembered the intimate contact (i.e., ‘Overall, just how well can you feel you are able to keep in mind everything you thought or felt following the event? ’, 1 = never to 5= very well; M = 3.38, SD = 1.27, n = 122), religiosity (for example., composite of two standard things: significance of religion/spirituality 1 = Not essential; 4 = very important; M = 2.09, SD = 1.09 and frequency of church attendance 1 = Never; 6 = once per week, M = 2.39, SD = 1.45; Spearman-Brown dependability coefficient: ? =. 79) and social desirability (ie., Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale; Crowne & Marlowe, 1960; Response scale: 1 = real, 2 = False; ? =. 63, M = 4.82, SD = 2.01). Finally, we additionally adjusted estimates centered on self-reported reputation for youth intimate attack, nude mature women molestation, or forcible/unwanted intercourse (0 = no reputation for intimate attack, 1 = self-reported intimate attack occurring before age 18; roughly 25% of individuals n = 30 reported a history of childhood intimate punishment).